danleach.co.uk

Yesterday I had the pleasure of attending the second Media140 event in London. This event was focused on brands and their use of social media platforms (particular focus on Twitter) and whilst it was a good event overall, like many events of this nature, it often drifted from insightful to insufferable (and back again).

The most notable thing missing from the conference was the number of brands in attendance – both in speaker slots and the audience. Whilst the likes of BA, Virgin Trains and Red Bull made a valued and insightful contribution, the event would have benefited from more case studies and brand perspective rather than theoretical hyperbole which was, at times, all that was coming from the stage.

That said, I would still recommend attending Media140 to colleagues and fellow social media enthusiasts as between the sales pitches and agency showcasing it did spark some lively debate and offered valuable face time with an inner circle of marketing bods who are influencing the way brands use the social media space.

The highlights for me included the excellent David McCandless who received the biggest cheer of the day simply by demonstrating the power that creative imagery can have on data. An example of his work is below but I urge you to read more via his Flickr channel (and buy his book in February 2010).

Also Ciaran Norris provided some excellent case studies of brands harnessing the 2.0 world, some more successfully than others. Richard Baker, General Manager at Virgin Train made us all reflect a little and appreciate that brands can be great at Twitter if they take a down to earth attitude towards it and simply try to help people.  And finally, Ted Hunt from Innocent Drinks who not only found a suitor within the audience but managed to keep his composure throughout a particularly raucous TwitterFall to demonstrate how personality is key to social media success.

Ande, who organises the events (whilst juggling a full time job I should add), kept his cool between major wi-fi outages which frustrated those in attendance and is looking to host further Media 140 events across the globe over the coming months. I would encourage everyone, if they get the chance, to attend and find out more about how brands, marketers and the media are harnessing the connected web.

As one panel member put it quite brilliantly (and honestly) yesterday, “…at the end of the day we’re all just making it up as we go along”. We are, but with events like Media140 we can at least pretend we know what we’re doing

Last week there were two incredible lapses in judgement from brands that saw people up in arms.

Firstly, Habitat. This has been well documented and covered but to recap – Habitat’s first foray into the Twittersphere ended disastrously after some bright spark decided that leveraging key trends or hashtags on Twitter would be a great way of getting more eyeballs on their tweets.

This resulted in the likes of “#MOUSAVI Join the database for free to win a £1,000 gift card” being posted on their account.

The second, Perez Hilton (yes, he counts as a brand). Upon learning about the tragic death of Michael Jackson, Perez posted this on his popular gossip blog.

This resulted in uproar on social media channels and the #unfollowperez hashtag started doing the rounds.

Both Habitat and Perez received negative comment and coverage as a result of their exploits and both were swift to apologise and correct their errors – Habitat deleted the offending (and offensive) tweets, Perez removing the image.

What is interesting is not the consumer backlash – this is to be expected given the errors in judgement, at least by anyone with half a mind – but the immediate forgiveness shown to both parties by consumers.

Yes they are continuing to receive a small amount criticism and yes both cases may have causes irreparable damage to each brand but largely the apologies were met with general acceptance.

The point is, and this is something I reiterate whenever asked to give a client a social media workshop, brands in general are still learning how best to leverage social media channels and mistakes will be made (even really stupid ones). But, as long as you learn from those mistakes, make adjustments and improve then social media can continue to be an incredibly fun and powerful channel which should be leveraged.

Using your audience as your marketing moral compass is not a bad thing as long as you do listen and change direction when told to.

I doubt Habitat will make the same mistake again – although judging by their Twitter account they may have just given up altogether. And, whilst Perez probably lapped up the controversy it could have been much worse than it was and he’ll be sure to double check his sources before opening MS Paint again.

Has the world gone mad….and when I say world I mean the British media?

I’m not condoning the actions of Russel Brand or Jonathan Ross, what they did went beyond an innocent prank and simply wasn’t funny, but this morning I’ve woken up the front page outrage aimed at the pair. What’s more, Gordon Brown has jumped into the furor blasting the pair, and Sky News informed me that the issue was likely to come up during Prime Minister’s Questions this afternoon.

With two wars, an economic crisis, an entertaining yet globally relevant US election, Tory sleaze etc is the outrage caused by this practical joke really reflective of its severity?

I can’t help but think it’s all gone a bit to far a la Princess Di (oh no he di’n't). Perhaps Elton John should dust off his songbook.

While I’m on the point of the media: On Sky News this morning, after Noel Gallagher blamed the decline of Top of the Pops for youth crime, its newspaper critic responded – “I don’t know if it’s true but it’s a good point!”

A good point indeed, particularly if you step out of the realm of reality. As the old saying goes…why let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Rant over!

A couple of weeks ago I posted an article discussing how traditional PR is dead and today’s Google Chrome announcement only furthers my belief that PRs must continue to looks at new and interesting ways of communicating to the media and consumers.

Google has pulled off, in my opinion, a mini masterstroke by announcing its new browser through a cartoon. Why? Well for a start it’s much more interesting than a press release. But, more importantly look at how the story is being reported, there are just as many blog posts and news articles discussing the cartoon as the product itself.

The cartoon does nothing more than communicate the key messages and features of Google Chrome but by packaging it in an interesting and unique way, (all of) those messages are reaching the end-user. By discussing or even posting scans of the cartoon the media are doing the equivalent of reprinting a press release.

I don’t think we can all go start sending out cartoons to journalists, we can’t lose sight that the Google brand and this particular announcement carries a fair amount of weight with the media. However, we shouldn’t be afraid of exploring new ways of engaging journalists and consumers, especially now that Google has given us the perfect case study.

If you ever want to see what a slow news day looks like just look at page 23-26 of today’s Metro:

P.23 – 118118 Survey revealing people are “discomgoogolated”
P.23 – New Samsung mobile phone that detects when people are smiling
P.23 – Vauxhall reveals best place to watch a sunset
P.25 – Hiscox Insurance reveals car engines turn women on
P.26 – Grazia announces its “cool list”

Great coup for the brands and the PRs involved but it does feel like the newsroom got to page 22 and ran out of stories. With Gustav, the Presidential election, the credit crunch etc – is there really not enough real news to fill the paper?

According to mad.co.uk, Guardian.co.uk has become the first UK newspaper site to notch up more than 20m unique users a month. The site saw a 12% increase month-on-month, a stark contrast to previous sector leader Mail Online, which experienced a record audience loss of 14.4%!